4.4 Article

Evolutionarily conserved mechanisms of male germline development in flowering plants and animals

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 377-382

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20130261

Keywords

animals; flowering plants; gametogenesis; male germline; meiosis; small RNA

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [PTDC/BIA-BCM/103787/2008, PTDC/SAU-BID/111796/2009, PTDC/BIA-BCM/111822/2009]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/63477/2009, SFRH/BPD/84214/2012]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/63477/2009, PTDC/SAU-BID/111796/2009, PTDC/BIA-BCM/111822/2009, PTDC/BIA-BCM/103787/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexual reproduction is the main reproductive strategy of the overwhelming majority of eukaryotes. This suggests that the last eukaryotic common ancestor was able to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction reflects the ability to perform meiosis, and ultimately generating gametes, which are cells that carry recombined half sets of the parental genome and are able to fertilize. These functions have been allocated to a highly specialized cell lineage: the germline. Given its significant evolutionary conservation, it is to be expected that the germline programme shares common molecular bases across extremely divergent eukaryotic species. In the present review, we aim to identify the unifying principles of male germline establishment and development by comparing two very disparate kingdoms: plants and animals. We argue that male meiosis defines two temporally regulated gene expression programmes: the first is required for meiotic commitment, and the second is required for the acquisition of fertilizing ability. Small RNA pathways are a further key communality, ultimately ensuring the epigenetic stability of the information conveyed by the male germline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available