4.4 Article

Epigenetic regulation of placental endocrine lineages and complications of pregnancy

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 701-709

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20130002

Keywords

fetal development; imprinted gene; placenta; placental endocrine signalling; pregnancy

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J015]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J015156/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/J015156/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A defining feature of mammals is the development in utero of the fetus supported by the constant flow of nutrients from the mother obtained via a specialized organ: the placenta. The placenta is also a major endocrine organ that synthesizes vast quantities of hormones and cytokines to instruct both maternal and fetal physiology. Nearly 20 years ago, David Haig and colleagues proposed that placental hormones were likely targets of the epigenetic process of genomic imprinting in response to the genetic conflicts imposed by in utero development [Haig (1993) Q. Rev. Biol. 68, 495-532]. There are two simple mechanisms through which genomic imprinting could regulate placental hormones. First, imprints could directly switch on or off alleles of specific genes. Secondly, imprinted genes could alter the expression of placental hormones by regulating the development of placental endocrine lineages. In mice, the placental hormones are synthesized in the trophoblast giant cells and spongiotrophoblast cells of the mature placenta. In the present article, I review the functional role of imprinted genes in regulating these endocrine lineages, which lends support to Haig's original hypothesis. I also discuss how imprinting defects in the placenta may adversely affect the health of the fetus and its mother during pregnancy and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available