4.5 Article

Theoretical analysis of bonding and stereochemical trends in doubly bridged copper(I)-copper(I) dimers

Journal

ORGANOMETALLICS
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1734-1742

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om0009132

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BFT/B3LYP calculations on known and hypothetical doubly bridged Cu(I)-Cu(I) dimers and other d(10)-d(10) analogues have been carried out. The bridging ligands may he only a donors (hydrides) or have added pi -donor (halides) or pi -acceptor (carbonyls, as get unknown) capabilities. In particular, the few reported LnCu(mu -C drop CR)(2)CuLm frameworks have been investigated, The latter are symmetric (type b) or asymmetric (types a and b), depending an the nature and number of terminal ligands (n = 1, 2; m = 1, 2). Beside the accurate geometric and energetic computations, the nature of the chemical bonding is explored in terms of perturbation theory arguments (EHMO approach). Thanks to the cs donor power of the bridges, electron density is driven into the bonding combinations (sigma and pi) of empty metal a and p(pi) orbitals, In the presence of pi -donor ligands, population of the corresponding sigma* and pi* levels occurs and the M-M bond vanishes. In contrast, insufficient hack-donation from copper d orbitals prevents the formation of bridged carbonyl dimers and trigonal-planar monomers are favored, A case study is that of the heterobinuclear d(10)-d(10) complex (CO)(2)-Cu(mu -CO)(2)Co(CO)(2) where the lone pairs of the CO bridges are preferentially directed toward cobalt for electronegativity reasons. X similar situation is highlighted for the model (PH3)(2)-Cu(mu -C drop CH)(2)Cu(PH3) (type b), where both bridges orient toward the unique fragment (PR3)Cu because of the different hybridization of L2M and LM sigma orbitals. In the species LnCu(mu -C drop CH)(2)CuLn (n = 2 or n = 1, type a or c), the potential energy surface for the symmetric to asymmetric rearrangement, of the central Cu2C2 ring is quite flat. However, a symmetric Cu-2(mu -C drop CR)(2) framework is achieved with eta (2)-bound alkynes (type c), This is attributable to the pi* levels of the latter Ligands, which stabilize the metal p(pi) orbitals involved in bridge bonding, The asymmetric Cu2C2 arrangement is preferred again in models where the terminal alkynes are substituted for by single phosphine ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available