4.7 Article

Cadmium accumulation in aortas of smokers

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 863-867

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.21.5.863

Keywords

aortas; aneurysm; smoking; muscle smooth; collagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a smoking-related disorder. Cadmium, inhaled from cigarettes, may accumulate in the aorta and facilitate weakening of the aorta through adverse effects on smooth muscle cell metabolism Cadmium was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry in infrarenal aortas from 13 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and from 17 age- and sex-matched patients with normal-diameter abdominal aorta. Total cadmium content was associated with smoking, assessed as pack-years (r=0.54, P=0.004), but was similar in aneurysmal and undilated aortas. The cadmium content (mean+/-SE) was higher in the media (3.25+/-0.53 ng/mg dry wt, 7+/-1.2 mu mol/L) than in the intima or adventitia (1.14+/-0.24 and 1.87+/-0.38 ng/mg dry wt, respectively; ANOVA, P<0.005). There was a strong correlation between medial cadmium content and pack-years of smoking (r=0.87, P<0.001). In aortic smooth muscle cells cultured on fibrillar collagen, cadmium inhibited DNA synthesis and collagen synthesis and diminished cell numbers (IC50 2 mu mol/L, 6 mu mol/L, and 6 mu mol/L, respectively), but higher concentrations of cadmium were required for upregulation of metallothionein (EC50 23 mu mol/L). The cadmium content of the aorta increases in direct proportion to the pack-years of cigarettes smoked, with selective accumulation in the medial layer. However, the cadmium content of aneurysmal aortas was not higher than that of nondilated aortas for patients with matched smoking history. In smokers, the level of cadmium accumulation is probably sufficient to impair the viability of cultured smooth muscle cells. Similar mechanisms could underlie the development of degenerative aortic disease in smokers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available