4.4 Article

Analysis of LRRK2 accessory repeat domains: prediction of repeat length, number and sites of Parkinson's disease mutations

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 1086-1089

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20120088

Keywords

armadillo; ankyrin; GTPase; leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2); Parkinson's disease; WD40

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [566743]
  2. Australian Brain Foundation
  3. Australian Postgraduate Research Award
  4. Dowd Neuroscience Fellowship
  5. Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various investigators have identified the major domain organization of LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2), which includes a GTPase ROC (Ras of complex proteins) domain followed by a COR (C-terminal of ROC) domain and a protein kinase domain. In addition, there are four domains composed of structural repeat motifs likely to be involved in regulation and localization of this complex protein. In the present paper, we report our bioinformatic analyses of the human LRRK2 amino acid sequence to predict the repeat size, number and likely boundaries for the armadillo repeat, ankyrin repeat, the leucine-rich repeat and WD40 repeat regions of LRRK2. Homology modelling using known protein structures with similar domains was used to predict structures, exposed residues and location of mutations for these repeat regions. We predict that the armadillo repeats, ankyrin repeats and leucine-rich repeats together form an extended N-terminal flexible 'solenoid'-like structure composed of tandem repeat modules likely to be important in anchoring to the membrane and cytoskeletal structures as well as binding to other protein ligands. Near the C-terminus of LRRK2, the WD40 repeat region is predicted to form a closed propeller structure that is important for protein complex formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available