Predictors of long-term survival after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation -: Is M-mode echocardiography sufficient?

Aims The clinical importance of pre-operative and follow-up echocardiographic studies in patients operated on for chronic severe aortic valve regurgitation is still a matter of debate. The prognostic significance of M-mode echocardiography has never been directly compared with clinical and angiographic data. Methods and Results Univariate and multivariate analyses of cumulative survival were pet-formed for clinical, echocardiographic and angiographic data of 125 patients operated on between 1975 and 1983, and followed for 13.3 +/- 6.4 years. Ten and 20 year survival rates were 77% and 48%, respectively. Age, NYHA class, angiographic volumes, ejection fraction, as well as M-mode echocardiographic end-systolic dimension and shortening fraction were the main pre-operative prognostic parameters for long-term survival. In a multivariate analysis the angiographic end-systolic volume index, age and preoperative NYHA class were independent pre-operative prognostic variables of long-term survival. A postoperative reduction in end-diastolic dimension of >20% predicted a significantly better late survival (74% vs 44% after 20 years, P<0.001). Conclusions Age, pre-operative NYHA class and left ventricular systolic function are the main determinants of long-term survival after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. Despite a slightly lower predictive value of echocardiography when compared to angiography, it appeared sufficient for everyday clinical decision making for valve replacement. Echocardiography within 6 months postoperatively is able to detect recovery of left ventricular function, and enables additional risk-stratification, regardless of pre-operative findings. (Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 866-873, doi:10,1 053/euhj.2000.2314) (C) 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.