4.7 Article

Differential antioxidative responses to cadmium in roots and leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Azad)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 52, Issue 358, Pages 1101-1109

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.358.1101

Keywords

cadmium; pea; oxidative stress; antioxidant; antioxidative enzymes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pea (Pisum sativum L. cv, Azad) plants exposed to 4 and 40 muM of Cd for 7 d in hydroponic culture were analysed with reference to the distribution of metal, the accumulation of biomass and the metal's effects on antioxidants and antioxidative enzymes in roots and leaves. Cd-induced a decrease in plant biomass. The maximum accumulation of Cd occurred in roots followed by stems and leaves. An enhanced level of lipid peroxidation and an increased tissue concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in both roots and leaves indicated that Cd caused oxidative stress in pea plants. Roots and leaves of pea plants responded differently to Cd with reference to the induction of enhanced activities of most of the enzymes monitored in the present study. These differential responses to Cd were further found to be associated with levels of Cd to which the plants were exposed. Cd-induced enhancement in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was more at 40 muM than at 4 muM in leaves. While catalase (CAT) prominently increased in leaves both at 4 and 40 muM Cd, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) showed maximum stimulation at 40 muM Cd in roots. Enhancement in glutathione reductase (GR) activity was also more at 40 muM than at 4 muM Cd in roots. While glutathione peroxidase (GPOX) activity decreased in roots and remained almost unmodified in leaves, glutathione S-transferase (GST) showed pronounced stimulation in both roots and leaves of pea plants exposed to 40 muM Cd. Increased activities of antioxidative enzymes in Cd-treated plants suggest that they have some additive function in the mechanism of metal tolerance in pea plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available