4.7 Article

Galaxy cluster gas mass fractions from Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect measurements:: Constraints on ΩM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 552, Issue 1, Pages 2-14

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/320443

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : observations; galaxies : clusters : general; techniques : interferometric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using sensitive centimeter-wave receivers mounted on the Owens Valley Radio Observatory and Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland-Association millimeter arrays, we have obtained interferometric measurements of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect toward massive galaxy clusters. We use the SZ data to determine the pressure distribution of the cluster gas and, in combination with published X-ray temperatures, to infer the gas mass and total gravitational mass of 18 clusters. The gas mass fraction, f(g), is calculated for each cluster and is extrapolated to the fiducial radius r(500) using the results of numerical simulations. The mean f(g) within r(500) is 0.081(-0.011)(+0.009) h(100) (-1)(statistical uncertainty at 68% confidence level, assuming Omega (M), = 0.3, Omega (Lambda) (g)= 0.7). We discuss possible sources of systematic errors in the mean f(g) measurement. We derive an upper limit for Omega (M) from this sample under the assumption that the mass composition of clusters within r(500) reflects the universal mass composition: Omega (M) h less than or equal to Omega (B)/f(g). The gas mass fractions depend on cosmology through the angular diameter distance and the r(500) correction factors. For a flat universe (Omega (Lambda) equivalent to 1 - Omega (M)) and h = 0.7, we find the measured gas mass fractions are consistent with Omega (M) < 0.40, at 68% confidence. Including estimates of the baryons contained in galaxies and the baryons which failed to become bound during the cluster formation process, we find (M) similar to 0.25.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available