4.8 Article

Human REG I gene is up-regulated in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its precursor lesions

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 1036-1042

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24168

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The peg I gene (regenerating gene) and its product (Reg protein) are a regenerating and/or proliferating factor(s) of pancreatic islet cells. The ectopic expression of REG I alpha was shown in colorectal carcinomas, suggesting that REG I alpha is related to their carcinogenesis. In this study, we examined the expression of REG I in intrahepatic cholangiotarcinoma (ICC) and its precursor lesion (biliary dysplasia). By polymerase chain reaction and in sih hybridization (ISH) studies using a total of 16 fresh liver specimens, REG I alpha mRNA was demonstrated in 6 of 11 (55%) ICC cases, but in 0 of 5 (0%) normal livers. Immunohistochemistry for REG I protein was performed in 100 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections obtained from the 18 cases of ICC alone, 45 hepatolithiasis with ICC (n = 19) or biliary dysplasia (n = 26), 21 hepatolithiasis alone (all with hyperplasia), and 16 normal livers. In ICC, the expression of REG I protein was significantly dependent on the histologic differentiation; 12 of 13 (92%) cases in papillary and well-differentiated, 6 of 16 (38%) cases in moderately differentiated, and 0 of 8 (0%) cases in poorly differentiated types. Moreover, in the lesions of hyperplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia in hepatolithiasis, REG I protein was expressed in 4 of 21 (19%), 7 of 12 (58%), and 13 of 14 (93%) cases, respectively. In normal liver, intrahepatic bile ducts were constantly negative for REG I protein. These findings suggest that neoexpression of REG I is a good marker for biliary mucosa at risk for development of ICC, and also that REG I plays a role in the early stages of biliary carcinogenesis, probably via a cell-proliferative effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available