4.6 Article

Protective effect of vitamin E, β-carotene and N-acetylcysteine from the brain oxidative stress induced in rats by lipopolysaccharide

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00032-2

Keywords

lipopolysaccharides; stress; rat; brain; antioxidants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The major goal of this study was to examine the ability of several antioxidants namely, vitamin E, beta -carotene and N-acetylcysteine, to protect the brain from oxidative stress induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin). LPS, a component of the bacterial wall of gram-negative bacteria, has been recognized as one of the most potent bacterial products in the induction of host inflammatory responses and tissue injury and was used in this study to mimic infections. LPS injection resulted in a significant increase in the stress indices, plasma corticosterone and glucose concentration, a significant alteration of the brain oxidative status observed as elevation of the level of malondialdehyde (MDA, index of lipid peroxidation) and reduction of reduced glutathione (GSH), and a disturbance in the brain energy metabolism presented as a reduction in the ATP/ADP ratio and an increase in the mitochondrial/cytosolic hexokinase ratio. However, the activities of brain superoxide dismutase and Na+, K+-ATPase and contents of cholesterol and phospholipids were not altered. Administration of the aforementioned antioxidants prior to LPS injection ameliorated the oxidative stress by reducing levels of MDA, restoring GSH content and normalizing the mitochondrial/cytosolic hexokinase ratio in the brain in addition to lowering levels of plasma corticosterone and glucose. In conclusion, this study showed the increased free radical generation during infections and LPS-induced stress. It also suggests that brain oxidative status and energy is disturbed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available