3.8 Article

Nuclear import and DNA-binding activity of RFX1 - Evidence for an autoinhibitory mechanism

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 268, Issue 10, Pages 3108-3116

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02211.x

Keywords

HBV enhancer; nuclear localization signal; nuclear retention; transcription factor; acidic stretch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RFX1 binds and regulates the enhancers of a number of viruses and cellular genes. RFX1 belongs to the evolutionarily conserved RFX protein family that shares a DNA-binding domain and a conserved C-terminal region. In RFX1 this conserved region mediates dimerization, and is followed by a unique C-terminal tail, containing a highly acidic stretch. In HL-60 cells nuclear translocation of RFX1 is regulated by protein kinase C with unknown mechanisms. By confocal fluorescence microscopy, we have identified a nonclassical nuclear localization signal (NLS) at the extreme C-terminus. The adjacent 'acidic region', which showed no independent NLS activity, potentiated the function of the NLS. Subcellular fractionation showed that the tight association of RFX1 with the nucleus is mediated by its DNA-binding domain and enhanced by the dimerization domain. In contrast, the acidic region inhibited nuclear association, by down-regulating the DNA-binding activity of RFX1. These data suggest an autoinhibitory interaction, which may regulate the function of RFX1 at the level of DNA binding. The C-terminal tail thus constitutes a composite localization domain, which on the one hand mediates nuclear import of RFX1, and on the other hand inhibits its association with the nucleus and binding to DNA. The participation of the acidic region in both activities suggests a mechanism by which the nuclear import and DNA-binding activity of RFX1 may be coordinately regulated by phosphorylation by kinases such as PKC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available