4.6 Article

The deuterium abundance in Jupiter and Saturn from ISO-SWS observations

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 370, Issue 2, Pages 610-622

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010259

Keywords

planets and satellites : Jupiter; infrared : solar system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations with the Short Wavelength Spectrometer (SWS) onboard the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) are used to determine the D/H ratio in Jupiter's and Saturn's atmospheres. The D/H ratio is measured independently in hydrogen (i.e. from the HD/H-2 ratio) and methane (from CH3D/CH4). Observations of the HD R(2) and R(3) rotational lines at 37.7 and 28.5 mum, of the H-2 S(0) and S(1) quadrupolar lines at 17.1 and 28.2 mum, of the methane nu (4) band at 7.7 mum, and of the CH3D nu (6) band at 8.6 mum are analyzed jointly, allowing;1 retrieval of thermal profiles and molecular abundances. On each planet, the D/H determinations from H-2 and CH4 give consistent results, but the accuracy is not sufficient to precisely determine the enrichment factor of D/H ill methane. Combining these determinations, we obtain the following values for the D/H ratio in hydrogen: (D/H)(H2) = (2.25 +/- 0.35) 10(-5) in Jupiter and (1.70(-0.45)(+0.75)) 10(-5) on Saturn. These values are consistent with and somewhat more accurate than roost earlier values. Comparing with inferences of protosolar D/H from solar wind measurements, it is confirmed that Jupiter is a reliable indicator of the protosolar D/H ratio. The protosolar denterium abundance inferred from the jovian value, (2.1 +/- 0.4) 10-5, indicates a minor decrease of the D/H ratio,. over the last 4.55 Gyr, in the part of the Galaxy where the Solar System was formed. Although the error bars overlap, most measurements, including ours, may point to a slightly smaller D/H ratio in Saturn's atmosphere than in Jupiter's, a surprising result which needs confirmation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available