4.6 Article

Self-reported weight and height - Implications for obesity research

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 294-298

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00293-8

Keywords

body mass index; body weight changes; weight perception; weight loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Self-reported weight and height are under- and over-reported, respectively, in epidemiologic studies. This tendency, which may adversely affect study operations, has not been evaluated among subjects being enrolled into a weight-loss program. Methods: Self-reported weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were compared to measured values in 91 overweight or obese (BMI>27.3) women being enrolled into a randomized, controlled trial of two behavioral interventions for weight loss. The effects of demographic factors, baseline weight, baseline height, and baseline BMI on weight and height reporting were assessed. Results: There was a significant difference between measured and reported weight (mean difference= -3.75 lb, p=0.0001) and height (mean difference= +0.35 in., p=0.0007). The mean difference between measured and reported BMI was -1.14 kg/m(2) (p=0.0001). Unemployed, retired? or disabled women were more likely to under-report their BMI than employed women (p=0.001). Six percent of subjects who were initially considered eligible for the study on the basis of the self-report were eventually excluded from the study because they did not meet the inclusion criterion for BMI. Conclusions: Obese women who seek weight-loss assistance tend to under-report their weight and over-report their height, suggesting that self-reported data are likely to be inaccurate. Misreporting is apparently influenced by employment and disability and has the potential to complicate recruitment of subjects for research studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available