4.1 Article

Intracellular protein scaffold-mediated display of random peptide libraries for phenotypic screens in mammalian cells

Journal

CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 521-534

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00031-X

Keywords

functional screen; intracellular peptide library; protein scaffold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mammalian cell screens of peptide libraries for changes in cellular phenotype may identify novel Functional peptides and their cognate binding partners, and allow identification of signal transduction network members or proteins important in disease processes. Results: Green fluorescent protein (GFP) peptide libraries with different structural biases were tested by retroviral expression in A549 carcinoma cells, HUVEC and other cell types. Three different loop replacement libraries, containing 12 or 18 random residues, were compatible with enhanced GFP (EGFP) folding, as was a C-terminally fused random 20-mer library. Library concentrations in A549 cells ranged from ca. 1 to 54 muM. Replacement of loop 3 with known nuclear localization sequence (NLS) peptides. but not with inactive mutants, directed EGFP to the nucleus. Microscopy-based screens of three different libraries for non-uniform localization revealed novel NLS peptides, novel variants of a peroxisomal localization motif. a variety of partial NLS peptides, peptides localized to the nucleolus, and nuclear-excluded peptides. Conclusions: Peptides can be presented by EGFP in conformations that can functionally interact with cellular constituents in mammalian cells. A phenotypic screen resulting in the discovery of novel localization peptides that were not cell type-specific suggests that this methodology may be applied to other screens in cells derived from diseased organisms, and illustrates the use of intracellular combinatorial peptide chemistry in mammalian cells. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. Ali rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available