4.0 Article

Decreased somal size of deep layer 3 pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 466-473

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.466

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH18951, MH60473, MH00519, MH45156] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Schizophrenia is associated with deficits in working memory, a cognitive function that depends on the connections of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) with the thalamus and other cortical regions. Pyramidal neurons in PFC deep layer 3 play a central role in both thalamocortical and corticocortical circuitry. Given that somal size tends to be associated with both the dendritic and axonal architecture of a neuron, abnormalities in these circuits in schizophrenia may be associated with a change in the somal size of deep layer 3 pyramidal neurons. Methods: We used design-based stereology to estimate the somal volume of pyramidal neurons in deep layer 3 of PFC area 9 in 28 subjects with schizophrenia, each of whom was matched to 1 normal comparison subject for sex, age, and postmortem interval. Results: The geometric mean of the somal volume estimates in the subjects with schizophrenia was significantly (P=.02) decreased by 9.2%. This decrease was associated with a shift in the distribution of somal volumes toward smaller sizes. Neither antipsychotic medication treatment history nor duration of illness was associated with somal size. Conclusions: These findings independently replicate previous reports of decreased somal size in the PFC in schizophrenia. The reduction in size of deep layer 3 pyramidal neurons is consistent with abnormalities in thalamocortical and corticocortical circuitry, suggesting that disruption of these circuits may contribute to cognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available