4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Synthesis of zeolites from fly ash at pilot plant scale.: Examples of potential applications

Journal

FUEL
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages 857-865

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00156-3

Keywords

fly ash; zeolite synthesis; ion exchange capacity; heavy metals; applications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the synthesis of zeolites from Spanish fly ashes at laboratory (g and kg sample size) and pilot plant (metric ton sample size) scales, and on the potential application of the synthesized zeolitic material. To this end, eleven Spanish fly ashes were selected and characterized in detail. A matrix of experimental parameters was built to optimize the synthesis of mono-mineral zeolite products from the different fly ashes. This was achieved by using Parr digestion bombs, KOH and NaOH as activation agents, under experimental conditions ranging from T = 150 to 200 degreesC, t = 3 to 48 h, C = 0.5 to 5 M, P = 4.7 to 15.3 atm, and solution/sample ratio from 2 to 18 mi gl Subsequently, experiments to synthesize NaPl zeolite were scaled up to kg sample and pilot plant scale. The zeolitic material obtained at these two scales was very similar. The NaPl zeolite content was estimated as 40%. The major potential applications of the zeolites obtained were tested by determining the cation exchange capacity (CEC) with ammonium and different heavy metals. The results showed CEC values from 160 to 260 meg. 100 g (1) for NaPl, herschelite, KM, linde F and K-chabazite for the majority of the cations investigated. The zeolitic material synthesized at pilot-plant scale yielded the following CECs for these heavy metals: 68 meq. 100 g(-1) for Ni(2+) 90 meq. 100 g(-1) for Cd(2+), 95 meq. 100 g(-1) for Zn(2+), 98 meq. 100 g(-1) for Pb(2+), 110 meq. 100 g(-1) for Fe(2+). 130 meq. 100 g(-1) for Ba(2+), 210 mu eq. 100 g(-1) for Cu(2-) and 260 meq. 100 g(-1) for Cr(3+). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available