3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

A comparison of the molecular species compositions of mammalian lung surfactant phospholipids

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00306-3

Keywords

lung surfactant; human; rat; rabbit; guinea pig; electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry phosphatidylcholine; phosphatidylinositol; phosphatidylglycerol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (PC16:0/16:0) is essential for pulmonary surfactant function, roles for other individual molecular species of surfactant phospholipids have not been established. If any phospholipid species other than PC16:0/16:0 is important for surfactant function, then it may be conserved across animal species. Consequently, we have quantified, by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry, molecular species compositions of phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) in surfactants from human, rabbit, rat and guinea pig lungs. While PC compositions displayed only relatively minor variations across the animal species studied, there were wide variations of PG and PI concentrations and compositions. Human surfactant PG and PI were enriched in the same three monounsaturated species (PG16:0/18:1, PG18:1/18:1 and PG18:0/18:1) with minimal amounts of PG16:0/16:0 or polyunsaturated species, while all animal surfactant PG contained increased concentrations of PG16:0/16:0 and PG16:0/18:2. Animal surfactant PIs were essentially monounsaturated except for a high content of PI18:0/20:4 (29%) in the rat. As these four surfactants all maintain appropriate lung function of the respective animal species, then all their varied compositions of acidic phospholipids must be adequate at promoting the processes of adsorption, film refinement, respreading and collapse characteristic of surfactant. We conclude that this effectively monounsaturated composition of anionic phospholipid molecular species is a common characteristic of mammalian surfactants. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available