4.2 Article

Dependence of near-surface magnetic susceptibility on dust accumulation rate and precipitation on the Chinese Loess Plateau

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 271-283

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/qres.2001.2224

Keywords

loess; paleosols; China; Loess Plateau; magnetic susceptibility; paleoclimate; eolian dust; soil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic susceptibility (MS) of surface sediment varies systematically across the Loess Plateau in central China, decreasing exponentially from >200 x 10(-8) m(3)/kg at the northern margin of the Qinling Shan to less than or equal to 30 x 10(-8) m(3)/kg near the southern margin of the Mu Us Desert. MS correlates highly with loess median grain size (r(2) = 0.79), which decreases south-southeastward across the plateau. It also correlates with mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) (r(2) = 0.58 and 0.60, respectively), and with their product MAT x MAP (r(2) = 0.83), which is considered a measure of potential pedogenic activity. Because regional isopleths depicting grain size and the primary meteorological parameters are nearly parallel, it is difficult to determine their relative influence on MS. A simple MS model, based on the observed spatial variation in loess thickness, permits quantitative assessment of the effect of the dust accumulation rate on the MS signal of surface sediment and isolates the likely role of climate in the production of magnetic minerals. The model suggests that 84% of the loess MS variance is dictated by the diluting effect of dust and 10-11% is associated with meteorological factors, primarily precipitation. The observed and modeled relationships support hypotheses that attribute variations in MS in the loess-paleosol succession to varying rates of dust deposition and in situ production of magnetic minerals in the accretionary soils, both of which are controlled by monsoon climate. (C) 2001 University of Washington.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available