4.7 Article

Obstructive nephropathy in children: Long-term progression after relief of posterior urethral valve

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages 1004-1010

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1004

Keywords

posterior urethral valve; obstructive nephropathy; progression

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK50419, T32 DK07526] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Approximately one third of children with end-stage renal disease have the illness because of urinary tract malformations, obstructive uropathy, and hypoplasia/dysplasia. The significant drop in infant mortality from obstructive uropathies in recent decades, attributable to prenatal diagnosis with renal ultrasonography and coordinated surgical and medical care, necessitated a reevaluation of the long-term outcome. Methods. To that end, we examined the long-term progression of obstructive nephropathy after neonatal relief of posterior urethral valves in our center over a span of 21 years, with diagnosis and care being provided by the same pediatric and urology team. Results. The 10 consecutive cases of posterior urethral valves represented 7% of all patients with congenital malformative uropathies seen over this period. The following procedures were performed: primary valve ablation (90%) and vesicostomy (40%). Seventy percent of patients progressed to end-stage renal disease over a (mean +/- standard error of the mean) follow-up of 11.3 +/- 2.1 years. The linear plot of the log of the inverse of serum creatinine versus time suggested unrelenting progression. The rate of progression was rapid after serum creatinine exceeded 5 mg/dL but the rate was slow and steady from serum creatinine of 1.5 to 5 mg/dL. Conclusions. To test the effect of a therapeutic intervention to ameliorate the rate of progression, this steady and prolonged progression of 0.5 mg/dL per year between serum creatinine concentration of 1.5 to 5 mg/dL would seem the optimal study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available