4.5 Article

Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: A pilot study

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 83-88

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00054725-200105000-00001

Keywords

infliximab; monoclonal antibody; steroid-refractory; tumor necrosis factor alpha; ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1 K23 DK02850-01K23] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks. compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit fur some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available