4.2 Article

Successful application of nonmyeloablative transplantation for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 639-642

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00632-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder that manifests as hemolytic anemia, venous thrombosis, and deficient hematopoiesis. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is considered the only curative therapeutic measure, transplant-related mortality is not negligible. Several studies supported the use of nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) for patients of advanced age or with organ dysfunction, Hence, we used NST in a PNH patient who suffered from acute renal failure due to repeated episodes of hemolysis, Materials and Methods We performed NST using a conditioning regimen consisting of cladribine 0.11 mg/kg X 6, busulfan 4 mg/kg x 2, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin 2.5 mg/kg x 2. He received peripheral blood stem cells from his human leukocyte antigen-matched brother. Prophylaxis against graft-vs-host disease was performed with cyclosporine A alone, Chimerism of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated serially using short tandem repeat analysis and flow cytometry, Results. No meaningful regimen-related toxicities were documented. Donor chimerism of 90 to 100% was achieved on day 14 and thereafter. The patient is doing well, without any recurrence of hemolysis 6 months after transplant, Follow-up chimerism studies confirmed stable and functioning donor-type hematopoiesis, Conclusions. NST may become a safe and curative approach in patients with PNH, Further studies are needed to establish the role of NST for treatment of PNH. (C) 2001 International Society for Experimental Hematology, Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available