4.5 Article

Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 177-180

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010648919150

Keywords

breast neoplams; mammography; survival analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To investigate breast cancer survival in small invasive breast cancers in relation to mammographic findings. Materials and methods. We investigated a consecutive series of 96 cases of 1-9 mm small invasive breast cancers diagnosed 1988-1994. Median follow-up of the survivors was 7 years (range: 4.5-10.5). Mammographic findings were classified into rounded masses, spiculated masses, calcifications (casting or pleomorphic) and masses combined with calcifications. Lymph node status and histological malignancy grade were also evaluated. Eight year survival rate in breast cancer was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and risk of death with proportional-hazards regression. Results. 6/96 women died from breast cancer. 3/14 had calcifications alone, 2/56 with spiculated masses, 1/12 with rounded masses. 5/78 who died were node-negative cancers and 1/4 was node-positive. The survival rate for the whole group was 93 %: 77 % for the calcifications alone group, 95 % for spiculated masses and 91 % for rounded masses. The survival rate for the node-negative cancers was 92 % compared to 75 % for node-positive cancers. Calcifications alone (p = 0.01) and node positivity (p = (0) over dot .03) had each independent significant higher risk of death taking finding, node status and grade into account. Conclusion. Small invasive breast cancers mammographically presenting as casting or pleomorphic calcifications alone have a significantly worse prognosis than other types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available