4.6 Article

Hepatitis B virus HBx protein activation of cyclin A-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 complexes and G1 transit via a Src kinase pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 4247-4257

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.9.4247-4257.2001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA056533, F32 CA074476, CA56533] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM51314] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the hepatitis B virus HBx protein stimulates signal transduction pathways and may bind to certain transcription factors, particularly the cyclic AMP response element binding protein, CREB. HBx has also been shown to promote early cell cycle progression, possibly by functionally replacing the TATA-binding protein-associated factor 250 (TAF(II)250), a transcriptional coactivator, and/or by stimulating cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways. To understand the basis for early cell cycle progression mediated by HBx, we characterized the molecular mechanism by which HBx promotes deregulation of the G(0) and G(1) cell cycle checkpoints in growth-arrested cells. We demonstrate that TAF(II)250 is absolutely required for HBx activation of the cyclin A promoter and for promotion of early cell cycle transit from G(0) through G(1). Thus, HBx does not functionally replace TAF(II)250 for transcriptional activity or for cell cycle progression, in contrast to a previous report. Instead, HBx is shown to activate the cyclin A promoter, induce cyclin A-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 complexes, and promote cycling of growth-arrested cells into G(1) through a pathway involving activation of Src tyrosine kinases. HBx stimulation of Src kinases and cyclin gene expression was found to force growth-arrested cells to transit through G(1) but to stall at the junction with S phase, which may be important for viral replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available