Journal
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 811-819Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2001.653811x
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A 937-horizon data set composed of site characteristics, morphology, and laboratory characterization data for soils of Ohio was used to develop soil bulk density (D-b) prediction models. We tested the hypothesis that using a combination of continuous variables (laboratory data) and nominal variables (site/state factor and morphological class descriptors) would enable the development of improved Pedo-Transfer Functions (PTFs) for D-b Three primary models were developed. The Lab Model, composed entirely of continuous variables, accounted for 56% of the variability in D-b Using only state factors and morphology as nominal variables, the Field Model explained 69%, A combined Field + Lab Model accounted for 72%, Restricting the data set to samples derived from loess and glacial till generated a Field + Lab Model that explained nearly 80% of the variability in D-b For a subset of 402 horizons.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available