4.5 Article

Neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) is the primary neutral sphingomyelinase isoform activated by tumour necrosis factor-α in MCF-7 cells

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 381-390

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20101752

Keywords

ceramide; cytokine; neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2); neutral sphingomyelinase 3 (nSMase3); sphingomyelinase; tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM 43825]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [C06 RR01882]
  3. NIH [P30 CA138313]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of N-SMase (neutral sphingomyelinase) is an established part of the response of cytokines such as TNF (tumour necrosis factor)-alpha. However, it remains unclear which of the currently cloned N-SMase isoforms (nSMase1, nSMase2 and nSMase3) are responsible for this activity. In MCF-7 cells, we found that TNF-alpha induces late, but not early, increases in N-SMase activity, and that nSMase2 is the primary isoform activated, most likely through post-transcriptional mechanisms. Surprisingly, overexpression of tagged or untagged nSMase3 in multiple cell lines had no significant effect on in vitro N-SMase activity. Moreover, only overexpression of nSMase2, but not nSMase1 or nSMase3, had significant effects on cellular sphingolipid levels, increasing ceramide and decreasing sphingomyelin. Additionally, only siRNA (small interfering RNA) knockdown of nSMase1 significantly decreased basal in vitro N-SMase activity of MCF-7 cells, whereas nSMase2 but not nSMase3 siRNA inhibited TNF-alpha-induced activity. Taken together, these results identify nSMase2 as the major TNF-alpha-responsive N-SMase in MCF-7 cells. Moreover, the results suggest that nSMase3 may not possess in vitro N-SMase activity and does not affect cellular sphingolipid levels in the cell lines evaluated. On the other hand, nSMase1 contributes to in vitro N-SMase activity, but does not affect cellular sphingolipids much.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available