4.7 Article

Prevalence of CY282Y and H63D mutations in the hemochromatosis (HFE) gene in the United States

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 285, Issue 17, Pages 2216-2222

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.17.2216

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Population-based estimates of the prevalence of disease-associated mutations. such as hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutations, are needed to determine the usefulness of genetic screening. Objective To estimate the prevalence of the HFE mutations C282Y and H63D in the US population. Design Cross-sectional population-based study of samples in the DNA bank from phase 2 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted from 1992 to 1994. Setting and Participants Genotyped samples of cells from a total of 5171 participants, cross-classified by sex, age, and race/ethnicity in the analysis. Main Outcome Measures Estimates of the prevalence of C282Y and H63D mutations. Results The prevalence of C282Y homozygosity is estimated to be 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12%-0.49%); 1.89% (95% CI, 1.48%-2.43%) for H63D homozygosity; and 1.97% (95% CI, 1.54%-2.49%) for compound heterozygosity. The prevalence estimates for C282Y heterozygosity (C282Y/wild type) are 9.54% among non-Hispanic whites, 2.33% among non-Hispanic blacks, and 2.75% among Mexican-Americans. The prevalence estimates of the C282Y mutation in the US population are 5.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-6.2%) and 13.5% (95% CI, 12.5%-14.8%) for the H63D mutation. Conclusions Estimates of prevalence of HFE mutations are within the expected range for non-Hispanic whites and blacks but the estimated prevalence of the C282Y mutation among Mexican-Americans is less than expected. Mutation data now need to be linked to clinically relevant indices, such as transferrin saturation level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available