4.5 Article

Comparison of two assay procedures for lignin peroxidase

Journal

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 7-8, Pages 602-605

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00302-7

Keywords

azure B; lignin peroxidase; veratryl alcohol; white rot fungi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most widely accepted assay for detecting lignin peroxidase, based on the oxidation of veratryl alcohol to veratraldehyde, suffers from some drawbacks. At 310 nm, the wavelength at which the assay is performed, some other materials like lignins. quinonic compounds and aromatics also exhibit strong absorbance thus interfering with! the estimation when present in the media. The present study reports the lignin peroxidase production by; some white rot fungi under different nutritional conditions. The veratryl alcohol oxidation assay procedure for lignin peroxidase has been compared with another method based on the oxidation of the dye azure B involving absorbance measurements in the visible range. The latter method proved to be much more advantageous over the veratryl alcohol oxidation method, in media supplemented with malt extract. lignin preparations and agricultural residues. The enzyme production by veratryl alcohol assay could be detected only in mineral salts broth. By the azure B assay the enzyme activity was detected in all the media tested. The supplements gave varied response in different media. Veratryl alcohol enhanced the enzyme production in malt extract broth and mineral salts malt extract broth. Among the lignin preparations Indulin AT increased the lignin peroxidase litres from to 20 fold in different fungi. Similarly, wheat straw supplemented in mineral salts broth and malt extract broth, separately. strongly stimulated the lignin peroxidase production The above studies revealed that azure B assay may act as a substitute or equivalent method. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available