4.8 Article

The chaperone GroEL is required for the final assembly of the molybdenum-iron protein of nitrogenase

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.101119498

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-43144] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is known that an E146D site-directed variant of the Azotobacter vinelandii iron protein (Fe protein) is specifically defective in its ability to participate in iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMoco) insertion. Molybdenum-iron protein (MoFe protein) from the strain expressing the E146D Fe protein is partially (approximate to 45%) FeMoco deficient. The free FeMoco that is not inserted accumulates in the cell. We were able to insert this free FeMoco into the partially pure FeMoco-deficient MoFe protein. This insertion reaction required crude extract of the Delta nifHDK A. vinelandii strain CA12, Fe protein and MgATP. We used this as an assay to purify a required insertion protein. The purified protein was identified as GroEL, based on the molecular mass of its subunit (58.8 kDa), crossreaction with commercially available antibodies raised against E. coli GroEL, and its NH2-terminal polypeptide sequence. The NH2-terminal polypeptide sequence showed identity of up to 84% to GroEL from various organisms. Purified GroEL of A. vinelandii alone or in combination with MgATP and Fe protein did not support the FeMoco insertion into pure FeMoco-deficient MoFe protein, suggesting that there are still other proteins and/or factors missing, By using GroEL-containing extracts from a Delta nifHDK strain of A. vinelandii CA12 along with FeMoco, Fe protein, and MgATP, we were able to supply all required proteins and/or factors and obtained a fully active reconstituted E146D nifH More protein. The involvement of the molecular chaperone GroEL in the insertion of a metal cluster into an apoprotein may have broad implications for the maturation of other metalloenzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available