4.5 Article

Control of AMPK-related kinases by USP9X and atypical Lys29/Lys33-inked polyubiquitin chains

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 411, Issue -, Pages 249-260

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20080067

Keywords

deubiquitination; LKB1; protein kinase; ubiquitination; ubiquitin-specific protease

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U127070193] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U127070193] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U127070193] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase)-related kinases regulate cell polarity as well as proliferation and are activated by the LKB1-tumour suppressor kinase. In the present study we demonstrate that the AMPK-related kinases, NUAK1 (AMPK-related kinase 5) and MARK4 (microtubule-affinity-regulating kinase 4), are polyubiquitinated in vivo and interact with the deubiquitinating enzyme USP9X (ubiquitin specific protease-9). Knockdown of USP9X increased polyubiquitination of NUAK1 and MARK4, whereas overexpression of USP9X inhibited ubiquitination. USP9X, catalysed the removal of polyubiquitin chains from wild-type NUAK1, but not from a non-USP9X-binding mutant. Topological analysis revealed that ubiquitin monomers attached to NUAK1 and MARK4 are linked by Lys(29) and/or Lys(33) rather than the more common Lys(48)/Lys(63). We find that AMPK and other AMPK-related kinases are also polyubiquitinated in cells. We identified non-USP9X-binding mutants of NUAK1 and MARK4 and find that these are hyper-ubiquitinated and not phosphorylated at their T-loop residue targeted by LKB1 when expressed in cells, suggesting that polyubiquitination may inhibit these enzymes. The results of the present study demonstrate that NUAK1 and MARK4 are substrates of USP9X and provide the first evidence that AMPK family kinases are regulated by unusual Lys(29)/Lys(33)-linked polyubiquitin chains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available