4.5 Article

Do mammals make all their own inosital hexakisphasphate?

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 416, Issue -, Pages 263-270

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20081417

Keywords

dietary phytate; inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP(6)); mass assay; phytate; phytic acid

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Royal Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly specific and sensitive mass assay for inositol hexakisphosphate (InS(P)6) was characterized. This centres around phosphorylating InsP(6), With [P-32]ATP using a recombinant InsP(6) kinase from Giardia lambia, followed by HPLC of the P-32-labelled products with an internal [H-3]InsP(7) standard. This assay was used to quantify InsP6 levels in a variety of biological samples. Concentrations of InsP, in rat tissues varied from 10-20 AM (assuming 64 % of wet weight of tissue is cytosol water), whereas using the same assumption axenic Dictyostelium discoideum cells contained 352 +/- 11 mu M InsP(6). HeLa cells were seeded at low density and grown to confluence, at which point they contained InSP6 levels per mg of protein similar to rat tissues. This amounted to 1.952 +/- 0.117 mnol InsP(6) per Culture dish, despite the cells being grown in serum shown to contain no detectable (less than 20 pmol per dish) InsP(6). These results demonstrate that mammalian cells synthesize all their own InsP, Human blood was analysed, and although the white cell fraction contained InSP6 at a concentration comparable with other tissues, in serum and platelet-free plasma no InSP6 was detected (< 1 nM InsP(6)). Human urine was also examined, and also contained no detectable (< 5 nM) InsP(6). These results suggest that dietary studies purporting to measure InSP6 at micromolar concentrations ill human plasma or urine may not have been quantifying this inositol phosphate. Therefore claims that administrating InsP(6) ill the diet or applying it topically can produce health benefits by increasing extracellular InSP6 levels may require reassessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available