4.7 Article

Launching of jets and the vertical structure of accretion disks

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 553, Issue 1, Pages 158-173

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/320637

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; galaxies : jets; hydrodynamics; ISM : jets and outflows; magnetic fields; MHD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The launching of magnetohydrodynamic outflows from accretion disks is considered. We formulate a model for the local vertical structure of a thin disk threaded by a poloidal magnetic field of dipolar symmetry. The model consists of an optically thick disk matched to an isothermal atmosphere. The disk is supposed to be turbulent and possesses an effective viscosity and an effective magnetic diffusivity. In the atmosphere, if the magnetic field lines are inclined sufficiently to the vertical, a magnetocentrifugal outflow is driven and passes through a slow magnetosonic point close to the surface. We determine how the rate of mass loss varies with the strength and inclination of the magnetic field. In particular, we find that for disks in which the mean poloidal held is sufficiently strong to stabilize the disk against the magnetorotational instability, the mass-loss rate decreases extremely rapidly with increasing field strength and is maximal at an inclination angle of 40 degrees -50 degrees. For turbulent disks with weaker mean fields, the mass-loss rate increases monotonically with increasing strength and inclination of the field, but the solution branch terminates before achieving excessive mass-loss rates. Our results suggest that efficient jet launching occurs for a limited range of field strengths and a limited range of inclination angles in excess of 30 degrees. In addition, we determine the direction and rate of radial migration of the poloidal magnetic flux and discuss whether configurations suitable for jet launching can be maintained against dissipation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available