4.5 Review

Nonviral vectors in the new millennium: Delivery barriers in gene transfer

Journal

HUMAN GENE THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 861-870

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/104303401750195836

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA74918] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI48851] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR45925] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK44935, DK54225] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of an efficient method for introducing a therapeutic gene into target cells in vivo is the key issue in treating genetic and acquired diseases by gene therapy. To this end, various nonviral vectors have been designed and developed, acid some of them are in clinical trials. The simplest approach is naked DNA injection into local tissues or systemic circulation. Physical (gene gun, electroporation) and chemical (cationic lipid or polymer) approaches have also been utilized to improve the efficiency and target cell specificity of gene transfer by plasmid DNA. After administration, however, nonviral vectors encounter many hurdles that result in diminished gene transfer in target cells. Cationic vectors sometimes attract serum proteins and blood cells when entering into blood circulation, which results in dynamic changes in their physicochemical properties. To reach target cells, nonviral vectors should pass through the capillaries, avoid recognition by mononuclear phagocytes, emerge from the blood vessels to the interstitium, and bind to the surface of the target cells. They then need to be internalized, escape from endosomes, and then find a way to the nucleus, avoiding cytoplasmic degradation. Successful clinical applications of nonviral vectors will rely on a better understanding of barriers in gene transfer and development of vectors that can overcome these barriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available