4.7 Article

Preconcentration of lead complexed with O,O-diethyl-dithiophosphate by column solid-phase extraction using different sorbents in a flow injection system coupled to a flame atomic absorption spectrometer

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 687-696

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00326-5

Keywords

atomic absorption spectrometry; preconcentration; activated carbon; polyurethane foam; C-18 immobilized on silica; lead

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study of C-18 immobilized on silica, activated carbon and a polyurethane foam, as sorbents for Pb complexed with O,O-diethyl-dithiophosphate in a flow injection preconcentration system is reported. The complex was formed in 1.0 M HCl medium and processed in a simple system using a peristaltic pump, a manual injector-commutator and a mini-column filled with the sorbent. Using ethanol as eluent, the richest 150-mul fraction was collected and measured (after discarding 150, 200 and 0 mul for the activated carbon, foam and C-18, respectively) by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimum concentration of the complexing agent was 0.05%, m/v for C-18 and 0.2% m/v for the activated carbon and the polyurethane foam. The best sample loading Row rate was 4.0 mi min (-1) for the activated carbon and 2.0 mi min (-1) for C-18, and the polyurethane foam, while the best elution Row rate was 1.0 mi min(-1) (activated carbon) and 0.6 mi min (-1) (C-18 and foam). It was found that beyond a certain loading sample volume, for a constant analyte mass, the signal decreased. The maximum loading sample volume, for a constant analyte mass, before the signal started to decrease, was 50 mi for the activated carbon and 150 mi for the other materials. By processing 25 mi, the enrichment factors were 23, 55 and 166 for the activated carbon, foam and C-18, respectively. The best limit of detection (3 sigma) was 0.3 mug l(-1) for the C-18 (1.2 mug l(-1) for the foam and 3 mug l(-1) for the activated carbon). As shown, the C-18 has a much superior retention performance in comparison to the other two materials. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available