4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in 780 breast cancer patients: A reappraisal of the prognostic value based on an eight-year median follow-up

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 841-846

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011183421477

Keywords

breast cancer; epidermal growth factor receptor; prognostic markers

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Because new therapeutic approaches target tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the aim was to undertake a thorough analysis of the expression profile of EGFR in breast cancer and to reassess its prognostic value. Patients and methods: Tumor EGFR levels were determined by a specific ligand binding assay in 780 consecutive breast cancer patients followed in our institute between 1980 and 1993. Mean age was 61 years (25-85 years). All patients had undergone tumor resection with axillary lymph node dissection: 373 patients (47.8%) underwent mastectomy, 37 (5%) subcutaneous mastectomy and 370 (47.2%) tumorectomy. Results: EGFR levels ranged between non-detectable up to 789 fmol/mg protein. EGFR median value was 9 fmol/mg protein and only a small proportion of patients exhibited a relatively marked EGFR expression. There was no link between tumor size, grade, node status and EGFR tumoral levels. There was a constant and significant decrease in EGFR tumoral levels according to patient age. A significant inverse relationship was found between estradiol receptors (ER) and EGFR. Median follow-up was 97 months with a minimum at 4 months and a maximum at 228 months. From univariate analysis it was found that histological grade, tumor size, node status and ER status were all significant predictors of survival, considering metastasis-free as well as overall survival. Using multivariable analysis, only histological grade, tumor size and node status remained independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: EGFR determination is of limited value as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available