4.5 Review

Forging the links between metabolism and carcinogenesis

Journal

MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH
Volume 488, Issue 3, Pages 195-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5742(01)00059-X

Keywords

carcinogens; metabolism; cytochrome P450; mutagenesis

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R35 CAA44353] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES00267] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolism plays important roles in chemical carcinogenesis, both good and bad. The process of carcinogen metabolism was first recognized in the first half of the twentieth century and developed extensively in the latter half. The activation of chemicals to reactive electrophiles that become covalently bound to DNA and protein was demonstrated by Miller and Miller [Cancer 47(1981) 2327]. Today many of the DNA adducts formed by chemical carcinogens are known, and extensive information is available about pathways leading to the electrophilic intermediates. Some concepts about the stability and reactivity of electrophiles derived from carcinogens have changed over the years. Early work in the field demonstrated the ability of chemicals to modulate the metabolism of carcinogens, a phenomenon now described as enzyme induction. The cytochrome P450 enzymes play a prominent role in the metabolism of carcinogens, both in bioactivation and detoxication. The conjugating enzymes can also play both beneficial and detrimental roles. As an example of a case in which several enzymes affect the metabolism and carcinogenicity of a chemical, aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) research has revealed insight into the myriad of reaction chemistry that can occur even with a 1 s half-life for a reactive electrophile. Further areas of investigation involve the consequences of enzyme variability in humans and include areas such as genomics, epidemiology, and chemoprevention. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available