4.4 Article

Activation of defense responses to Fusarium infection in Asparagus densiflorus

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages 473-483

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011218304331

Keywords

antifungal property; asparagus; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.; asparagi; F. proliferatum; hypersensitive response; peroxidase; phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defense responses to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. asparagi and F. proliferatum were compared after root inoculation of the asparagus fern, Asparagus densiflorus vars. Myersii and Sprengeri, and cultivated asparagus, A. officinalis cv. Guelph Millennium. Both varieties of A. densiflorus exhibited a hypersensitive response with rapid death of epidermal cells within 8-24 h and restricted the fungal growth. In A. officinalis roots, rapid cell death was not found, and necrotic lesions were observed 8-14 d after fungal inoculation. Peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities increased significantly in inoculated A. densiflorus but not A. officinalis plants. Local and systemic induction of peroxidase activity was detected after pathogen inoculation in root and spear tissues, respectively, of A. densiflorus. POX activity decreased in roots of inoculated A. officinalis by 8 d post-inoculation. Germination and germ tube growth were inhibited when spores of F. oxysporum f. sp. asparagi were incubated in root exudates and on root segment surfaces of inoculated A. densiflorus plants exhibiting hypersensitive cell death. Spore germination of F. proliferatum and three fungi non-pathogenic to cultivated asparagus was inhibited as well. Rapid induction of hypersensitive cell death in A. densiflorus was associated with restriction of fungal growth, and activation of peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, two defense enzymes thought to be important for plant disease resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available