4.5 Review

Physiological and genomic consequences of intermittent hypoxia: Invited review: Intermittent hypoxia and respiratory plasticity

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 2466-2475

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2466

Keywords

respiratory control; serotonin; neurotrophins; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; episodic hypoxia

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-53319, HL-36780, HL-65383] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-33913] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intermittent hypoxia elicits long-term facilitation (LTF), a persistant augmentation (hours) of respiratory motor output. Considerable recent progress has been made toward an understanding of the mechanism and manifestations of this potentially important model of respiratory plasticity. LTF is elicited by intermittent but not sustained hypoxia, indicating profound pattern sensitivity in its underlying mechanism. During intermittent hypoxia, episodic spinal serotonin receptor activation initiates cell signalling events, increasing protein synthesis. One associated protein is brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a neurotrophin implicated in several forms of synaptic plasticity. our working hypothesis is that increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor enhances glutamatergic synaptic currents in phrenic motoneurons, increasing their responsiveness to bulbospinal inspiratory inputs. LTF is heterogenous among respiratory outputs, differs among experimental preparations, and is influenced by age, gender, and genetics. Furthermore, LTF is enhanced following chronic intermittent hypoxia, indicating a degree of metaplasticity. Although the physiological relevance of LTF remains unclear, it may reflect a general mechanism whereby intermittent serotonin receptor activation elicits respiratory plasticity, adapting system performance to the ever-changing requirements of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available