4.6 Article

Comparative analyses of the pigment-aggregating and -dispersing actions of MCH on fish chromatophores

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00187-9

Keywords

erythrophores; cAMP; chromatophores; fish; leucophores; melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH); melanophores; melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) receptor; xanthophores

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In melanophores of the peppered catfish and the Nile tilapia, melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) at low doses (< 1 muM) induced pigment aggregation, and the aggregated state was maintained in the presence of MCH. However, at higher MCH concentrations (such as I and 10 muM), pigment aggregation was immediately followed by some re-dispersion, even in the continued presence of MCH, which led to an apparent decrease in aggregation. This pigment-dispersing activity at higher concentrations of MCH required extracellular Ca2+ ions. By contrast, medaka melanophores responded to MCH only by pigment aggregation, even at the highest concentration employed (10 muM). Since it is known that medaka melanophores possess specific receptors for cr-melanophore-stimulating hormone (alpha -MSH), the possibility that interaction between M:SH receptors and MCH at high doses in the presence of Ca2+ might cause pigment dispersion is ruled out. Cyclic MCH analogs, MCH (1-14) and MCH (5-17), failed to induce pigment dispersion, whereas they induced aggregation of melanin granules. These results suggest that another type of MCH receptor that mediates pigment dispersion is present in catfish and tilapia melanophores, and that intact MCH may be the only molecule that can bind to these receptors. Determinations of cAMP content in melanophores, which were isolated from the skin of three fish species and treated with 10 nM or 10 muM MCH, indicate that MCH receptors mediating aggregation may be coupled with Gi protein, whereas MCH receptors that mediate dispersion may be linked to Gs. The response of erythrophores, xanthophores and leucophores to MCH at various concentrations was also examined, and the results suggest that the distribution patterns of the two types of MCH receptors may differ among fish species and among types of chromatophore in the same fish. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available