4.6 Article

Proteomics analysis of autophagy-deficient Atg7-/- MEFs reveals a close relationship between F-actin and autophagy

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.111

Keywords

Proteomics analysis; Autophagy-deficient MEFs; Atg7; F-actin

Funding

  1. Twelfth Five-Year National Science and Technology Support Program [2012BAI29B06]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81274170]
  3. Jinan University's Scientific Research Creativeness Cultivation Project for Outstanding Undergraduates Recommended for Postgraduate Study
  4. Major Platform Project Funds of Administration of Ocean and Fisheries of Guangdong, China [GD2012-D01-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autophagy plays a crucial role in a wide array of physiological processes. To uncover the complex regulatory networks and mechanisms underlying basal autophagy, we performed a quantitative proteomics analysis of autophagy-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEFs) using iTRAQ labeling coupled with on-line 2D LC/MS/MS. We quantified a total of 1234 proteins and identified 114 proteins that were significantly altered (90% confidence interval), including 48 up-regulated proteins and 66 down-regulated proteins. We determined that F-actin was disassembled in autophagy-deficient Atg7(-/-) MEFs. Treatment of the WT MEFs with cytochalasin D (CD), which induces F-actin depolymerization, significantly induced autophagosome formation. However, treatment with cytochalasin D also increased the protein level of p62 under starvation conditions, suggesting that depolymerization of F-actin impaired autophagosome maturation and that the intact F-actin network is required for basal and starvation-induced autophagy. Our results demonstrate a close relationship between F-actin and autophagy and provide the basis for further investigation of their interactions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available