4.6 Article

miR-210 regulates the interaction between pancreatic cancer cells and stellate cells

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.097

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatitis; Fibrosis; Stroma; MicroRNA

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Pancreas Research Foundation of Japan
  3. Kanae Foundation for Life and Socio-Medical Science
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  6. Research Committee of Intractable Pancreatic Diseases by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is accumulating evidence that pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) promote the progression of pancreatic cancer. microRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs acting as negative regulators of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. This study aimed to clarify the role of miRNAs in the interaction between PSCs and pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreatic cancer cells were mono-cultured or indirectly co-cultured with PSCs. miRNAs were prepared, and Agilent's miRNA microarray containing probes for 904 human miRNAs was used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs. miR-210 was identified as an upregulated miRNA by co-culture with PSCs. Conditioned media of PSCs activated ERK and Akt, but not hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha pathway. PSCs-induced miR-210 upregulation was inhibited by inhibitors of ERR and PI3K/Akt pathways. Inhibition of miR-210 expression decreased migration, decreased the expression of vimentin and snai-1, and increased the membrane-associated expression of beta-catenin in Panc-1 cells co-cultured with PSCs. In conclusion, our results suggest a novel role of miR-210 in the interaction between PSCs and pancreatic cancer cells. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available