4.3 Article

Porcine oocyte activation:: Differing roles of calcium and pH

Journal

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 227-234

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1027

Keywords

pH; calcium; oocyte; pig; activation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracellular pH has recently been shown to increase during parthenogenetic activation of the porcine oocyte. In the following set of experiments, intracellular pH was monitored during activation and pronuclear development was assessed following activation treatments with calcium, in the absence of calcium, and in oocytes loaded with the calcium chelator BAPTA-AM in calcium-free medium. Intracellular pH increase was not different among groups when treating with 7% ethanol or 50 muM calcium ionophore, or during treatment with thimerosal for 12 or 25 min. Activation with thimerosal (200 muM, 12 min) followed by 8 mM dithiothreitol (DTT, 30 min) resulted in a decreased pronuclear development in calcium-free medium with or without BAPTA-AM loaded oocytes as compared to controls. Activation with 50 muM calcium ionophore resulted in pronuclear development that was different between the calcium-free and BAPTA-AM loaded oocytes in calcium-free medium. Similar incidences of pronuclear formation were observed in all ethanol treatment groups. It was concluded that external calcium as well as large changes in intracellular free calcium are not necessary for the increase in intracellular pH, but normal intracellular calcium signaling is critical for normal levels of pronuclear development. Finally, oocytes were measured for intracellular pH changes for 30 min following subzonal sperm injection. Intracellular pH did not increase, although pronuclear formation was observed 6 hr post SUZI. This suggested that major differences were still present between sperm-induced and parthenogenetic activation of the porcine oocyte. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 59:227-234, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available