4.6 Article

Enhanced neuronal differentiation of pheochromocytoma 12 cells on polydopamine-modified surface

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 430, Issue 4, Pages 1294-1300

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.123

Keywords

Cell adhesion; Neuronal differentiation; Pheochromocytoma 12 cell; Polydopamine

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0020352]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0020352] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since pheochromocytoma 12 (PC12) cells have the ability of neuronal differentiation upon nerve growth factor (NGF) treatment, they are a good model for studying the neuronal differentiation. Establishing a strong adhesion of PC12 cells to the culture substrate may increase neuronal differentiation, and the use of L-3,4-dihydroxypfienylalanine (L-DOPA), which is responsible for the adhesive property of mussel adhesive proteins (MAPs), is a feasible strategy for such strong adhesion. We hypothesized that a polydopamine-modified surface can promote PC12 cell adhesion and subsequent neuronal differentiation. We examined whether polydopamine-modified surface promotes PC12 cell adhesion, and further evaluated the neuronal differentiation of these cells. The polydopamine modification enhanced the cell adhesion and viability, and also promoted the neuronal differentiation of NGF-stimulated PC12 cells, as evidenced by the elongation of neurites and expression of neuronal differentiation markers, by increasing the activation of NGF/Trk-Rho GTPase signal pathway. Our findings will help develop an improved strategy for functionalizing biomaterial substrates for less-adhesive cells including neural cells. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available