4.6 Article

Plant genome size measurement with DNA image cytometry

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages 719-728

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1394

Keywords

DNA image cytometry; nuclear DNA content; genome size; quality control standards for slides; prophase/telophase method; interphase-peak method

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the reliability of DNA image cytometry for the measurement of nuclear DNA content in plant material, we conducted independent experiments in two laboratories using different image analysis instruments for densitometric measurement of nuclear DNA amount in Feulgen-stained squash preparations of root tips. The 2C nuclear DNA content of the nine species studied spanned a 100-fold range (approx. 0.3-33 pg). The estimates of nuclear DNA content measured with image cytometry methods were comparable to values obtained previously using both photometric cytometry and how cytometry. Image cytometry methods showed little variation among repealed experiments within each laboratory or among different operators using the same instrument. Furthermore, the interphase-peak method (measurement of several hundred interphase nuclei per slide) was comparable to the classical prophase/telophase approach (measurement of ten early prophase and ten late telophase nuclei per slide). Hence, DNA image cytometry gives accurate and reproducible results and may be used as an alternative to photometric cytometry in plant nuclear DNA content measurements. In the present study, we propose that two standards for quality control of nuclear DNA content measurement are used in plant DNA image cytometry: (1) the coefficient of variation of the peak should be lower than 6%, and (2) the 4C/2C ratio should be between 1.9 and 2.1. (C) 2001 Annals of Botany Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available