4.6 Article

High calorie diet augments age-associated sleep impairment in Drosophila

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.041

Keywords

Sleep; Locomotor activity; Aging; Diet; Dopamine; Drosophila

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan (MEXT) [17024049]
  2. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15300108, 17300105]
  3. 21st Century Center of Excellence (COE)
  4. Global COE from MEXT
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17024049, 22300132, 15300108, 22700433, 17300105] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster is an established model used for aging and longevity studies and more recently for sleep studies. Mammals and Drosophila share various physiological, pathological, pharmacological and genetic similarities in these processes. In particular, sleep is essential for survival in both species and both have age-associated sleep quality alterations. Here we report that a high calorie diet, which accelerates the aging process and reduces lifespan across species, also accelerates age-associated sleep changes in Drosophila. These changes are more evident in the dopamine transporter mutant. fumin, that displays a short sleep phenotype due to enhanced dopaminergic signaling. With normal food, fumin mutants sleep for only one third of the time that the control flies do, but still show equivalent longevity. However, when on a mildly high calorie diet, their sleep length shows a marked decrease and they have a reduced longevity. These data indicate that the age-associated change in sleep in Drosophila is a physiologically regulated aging process that is tightly linked to calorie intake and that the dopamine level plays an important role. In addition, this provides another evidence that sleep is essential for the longevity of Drosophila. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available