4.7 Article

Arrhythmogenesis and contractile dysfunction in heart failure -: Roles of sodium-calcium exchange, inward rectifier potassium current, and residual β-adrenergic responsiveness

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 1159-1167

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh1101.091193

Keywords

heart failure; excitation-contraction coupling; Na+-Ca2+ exchange; Ca2+ transport; K+ currents

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-64724, HL-46929, HL-30077] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ventricular arrhythmias and contractile dysfunction are the main causes of death in human heart failure (HF). In a rabbit HF model reproducing these same aspects of human HF, we demonstrate that a 2-fold functional upregulation of Na+-Ca2+ exchange (NaCaX) unloads sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ stores, reducing Ca2+ transients and contractile function, Whereas beta -adrenergic receptors (beta -ARs) are progressively downregulated in I-IF, residual beta -AR responsiveness at this critical HF stage allows SR Ca2+ load to increase, causing spontaneous SR Ca2+ release and transient inward current carried by NaCaX. A given Ca2+ release produces greater arrhythmogenic inward current in HF las a result of NaCaX upregulation), and approximate to 50% less Ca2+ release is required to trigger an action potential in HF. The inward rectifier potassium current (I-K1) is reduced by 49% in HF, and this allows greater depolarization for a given NaCaX current. partially blocking I-K1 in control cells with barium mimics the greater depolarization for a given current injection seen in HF. Thus, we present data to support a novel. paradigm in which changes in NaCaX and I-K1 and residual beta -AR responsiveness, conspire to greatly increase the propensity for triggered arrhythmias in HF. In addition, NaCaX upregulation appears to be a critical link between contractile dysfunction and arrhythmogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available