4.7 Article

Influence of depth, focal mechanism, and tectonic setting on the shape and duration of earthquake source time functions

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 106, Issue B6, Pages 11137-11150

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000JB900468

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Source time functions of 255 moderate to great earthquakes obtained from inversions of teleseismic body waves by Tanioka and Ruff [1997] and coworkers were compared in a systematic way. They were scaled to remove the effect of moment and to allow the direct comparison and averaging of time function shape as well as duration. Time function durations picked by Tanioka and Ryff[1997] are proportional to the cube root of seismic moment if moments from the Harvard centroid moment tenser catalog are used. The average duration of scaled time functions is shorter and the average shape has a more abrupt termination for deeper events than shallower ones, with a distinct change occurring at similar to 40 km depth. The complexity of the time functions, as quantified by the number of subevents, appears to decrease below similar to 40 km depth. Furthermore, among events shallower than 40 km, the average duration of scaled time functions is shorter, and their average shape has a more abrupt termination (1) for events with strike-slip focal mechanisms compared to thrust events and (2) for the few thrust events associated with an intraplate setting compared to the majority associated with an interplate (subduction) boundary. In each of these cases, events in more tectonically and seismically active settings have a longer duration and a more gradual termination. This can be interpreted in terms of lower stress drops and/or slower rupture velocities at active plate boundaries, suggesting that fault theology depends on slip rate and may evolve as total fault slip accumulates. Furthermore, differences in average time function shape and duration associated with different subduction zones suggest that differences exist in the theology on the plate boundaries at the various subduction zones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available