4.6 Article

Bacterial persisters tolerate antibiotics by not producing hydroxyl radicals

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.063

Keywords

Persistence; Resistance; Antibiotics; Hydroxyl radical; Flow cytometer

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0006268, 2009-0058612]
  3. iPET (Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries)
  4. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a phenomenon called persistence, small numbers of bacterial cells survive even after exposure to antibiotics. Recently, bactericidal antibiotics have been demonstrated to kill bacteria by increasing the levels of hydroxyl radicals inside cells. In the present study, we report a direct correlation between intracellular hydroxyl radical formation and bacterial persistence. By conducting flow cytometric analysis in a three-dimensional space, we resolved distinct bacterial populations in terms of intracellular hydroxyl radical levels, morphology and viability. We determined that, upon antibiotic treatment, a small sub-population of Escherichia coli survivors do not overproduce hydroxyl radicals and maintain normal morphology, whereas most bacterial cells were killed by accumulating hydroxyl radicals and displayed filamentous morphology. Our results suggest that bacterial persisters can be formed once they have transient defects in mediating reactions involved in the hydroxyl radical formation pathway. Thus, it is highly probable that persisters do not share a common mechanism but each persister cell respond to antibiotics in different ways, while they all commonly show lowered hydroxyl radical formation and enhanced tolerance to antibiotics. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available