4.6 Article

Spatial grouping of United States climate stations using a hybrid clustering approach

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 791-807

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/joc.645

Keywords

cluster analysis; rank correlation; seasonal temperature; seasonal precipitation; station density

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a hybrid clustering technique based on the geographic proximity of observing stations and some application-driven measure of statistical similarity (in this case rank correlation) is described. The procedure is then applied to temperature and precipitation data From the United States (US) Historical Climatology Network. The resulting station groups provide some insight into the number of observation stations that are necessary to monitor adequately the climate of the US. Based on temperature data alone, a 287-station subset of the original 1145 sites would be adequate to account for 80X of the spatial variability in seasonal temperature across the US. Geographically the distribution of these stations would be relatively sparse in the centre of the country with higher station density along the East Coast and from the Rocky Mountains to the West Coast. Generally, the temperature clusters match the existing US climate divisions to some extent. To monitor adequately the spatial variability of precipitation, a network of similar size could be used. However, such a network would only account for 65% of the spatial variability in precipitation. In this case, fairly uniform station density is indicated across the country with the highest station density in Florida and the Dakotas. A similar number of stations, but with slightly different geographic groupings would be adequate to monitor precipitation and temperature simultaneously. Copyright (C) 2001 Royal Meteorological Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available