4.6 Article

DNA methylation-dependent regulation of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.116

Keywords

Trk; Hepatocellular carcinoma; DNA methylation; Twist

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0077455]
  2. National institute of Toxicological Research [09182EDS599]
  3. Korea Food & Drug Administration
  4. Yonsei University College of Medicine [6-2008-0276]
  5. Food & Drug Administration (KFDA), Republic of Korea [15993-11162유해영726] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0077455] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk) family of neurotrophin receptors, TrkA TrkB and TrkC, has been implicated in the growth and survival of human cancers. Here we report that Trks are frequently overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from patients and human liver cancer cell lines. To unravel the underlying molecular mechanism(s) for this phenomenon, DNA methylation patterns of CpG islands in TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes were examined in normal and cancer cell lines derived from liver. A good correlation was observed between promoter hypermethylation and lower expression of TrkA. TrkB, and TrkC genes, which was supported by the data that inhibiting DNA methylation with 5-azacytidine restored expression of those genes in normal liver cell lines. Furthermore. Irks promoted the proliferation of HepG2 and induced expression of the metastatic regulator, Twist. These results suggest that Irks may contribute to growth and metastasis of liver cancer. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available