4.7 Article

Inhibition of store-operated calcium entry contributes to the anti-proliferative effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human colon cancer cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 877-882

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1280

Keywords

anti-inflammatory drugs; calcium entry; calcium channel; colon cancer; cell cycle; apoptosis; proliferation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit proliferation and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. We examined a possible involvement of store-operated calcium (SOC) entry in human colon carcinoma cells (HRT-18), which require calcium for proliferation. Acetyl-salicylic-ac id (ASA), mefenamic acid (MEF) and sulindac sulfide (SUS) inhibited cell proliferation with the following order of potency: SUS > MEF > > ASA, SUS but not MEF and ASA induced apoptosis following low-dose treatment, Furthermore, SUS and MEF significantly altered the cell cycle distribution. The ability of NSAIDs to inhibit SOC entry was assessed by measuring the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in response to calcium store depletion using the endoplasmic calcium ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin. SUS and MEF, but not ASA significantly inhibited SOC entry. A causal link between SOC entry inhibition and anti-proliferative activity was tested using the inorganic SOC entry inhibitor La(3+) and the specific organic inhibitor N-1-n-octyl-3,5-bis-(4-pyridyl)triazole (DPT), Both La(3+) and DPT inhibited cell proliferation and SOC entry. Analogous to MEF, the anti-proliferative effect of DPT was mediated by cell cycle arrest and not by induction of apoptosis, These data indicate a role of SOC entry for cell proliferation in cancer cells and suggest a novel anti-proliferative NSAID mechanism in addition to its known influence on lipid metabolism. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available